<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fantasy Ethos &#187; Bleacher Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fantasyethos.com/category/bleacher-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fantasyethos.com</link>
	<description>Fantasy Sports Culture, News, Jobs, Industry, Business, Humor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 03:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fantasy Factoids: Football vs. Basketball Edition</title>
		<link>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/11/fantasy-factoids-football-vs-basketball-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/11/fantasy-factoids-football-vs-basketball-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deckardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bleacher Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Factoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RotoWire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyethos.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of really good articles have been written in the last week or so, and these are a few I thought that I would pass along to you. Go ahead, take a read: From RotoWire: Usually the argument is whether fantasy football is better than fantasy baseball. But, Kenn Ruby dares to argue both sides [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of really good articles have been written in the last week or so, and these are a few I thought that I would pass along to you. Go ahead, take a read:</p>
<ul>
<li>From <a href="http://rotowire.com">RotoWire</a>: Usually the argument is whether fantasy football is better than fantasy baseball. But, Kenn Ruby dares to argue both sides of the &#8220;which is better, fantasy football or fantasy basketball&#8221; argument. Check out <a href="http://rotosynthesis.rotowire.com/Why-Fantasy-Football-is-Better-Than-Fantasy-Basketball-BBD1516.htm">Why Fantasy Football is Better Than Fantasy Basketball</a> and <a href="http://rotosynthesis.rotowire.com/Why-Fantasy-Basketball-is-Better-Than-Fantasy-Football-BBD1504.htm">Why Fantasy Basketball is Better Than Fantasy Football</a></li>
<li>From <a href="http://opensports.com">Open Sports</a>: Daniel Dobish of Open Sports writes about ten reasons to play <a href="http://www.opensports.com/community/user/blog_entry/5541319/16ec50c8-3090-493c-9a11-2de3e2ffc293">Fox&#8217;s Fantasy Quick challenge</a>. Expect he never mentions that Fox Sports is a major investor in Open Sports and that Open Sports actually built the game for Fox (see: <a href="http://fantasyethos.com/2009/07/fox-sports-outsources-fantasy-to-open-sports/">Fox Sports Outsources Fantasy to Open Sports</a>). It is perfectly fine to promote your products, but let users know you are, because it is sort of illegal now, according to the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm">latest FTC guidelines on advertisements</a>.</li>
<li>From <a href="http://usatoday.com">USA Today</a>: Looks like <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/mensbasketball/2009-11-04-espn-interested-in-bidding-for-march-madness_N.htm">ESPN is looking to bid for March Madness</a>, which has been on <a href="http://cbssports.com">CBS Sports</a> for the longest time. Honestly, I could careless which network broadcasts the NCAA Tournament, but if this means the end of <a href="http://mmod.ncaa.com/">March Madness on Demand</a>, there will be some very upset fans (and happy managers).</li>
<li>From <a href="http://bleacherreport.com">Bleacher Report</a>: I love this diatribe about how fantasy football on the whole needs to really start including real defensive stats. In Walter Kirkwood&#8217;s <a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/283575-man-up-america-its-time-for-defense-in-fantasy-football">Man Up, America: It&#8217;s Time for Defense in Fantasy Football</a>, I love how he asks if I even knew about <a href="http://www.nfl.com/players/patrickwillis/profile?id=WIL618736">Patrick Willis</a>&#8216; phenomenal rookie season, and then he read my mind by daring me to name his team. I had clue (it&#8217;s SF), but the article is an entertaining read.</li>
</ul>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to come back here often for more fantasy goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/11/fantasy-factoids-football-vs-basketball-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bleacher Report Does the Right Thing</title>
		<link>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/07/bleacher-report-does-the-right-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/07/bleacher-report-does-the-right-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deckardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bleacher Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBSSports.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyethos.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I reported how Bleacher Report had censored an article about Bleacher Report. Last night I received an email from Dave Morrison at Bleacher Report, and he reported that the article had been re-posted. You can now find Don Fish&#8217;s article, &#8220;CBSSports.com Burns Bleacher Report Applicants For NFL Correspondents&#8221; happily posted on Bleacher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bleacherreport.com"><img src="http://fantasyethos.com/images/bleacherreport.png" alt="Bleacher Report" /></a>Earlier this week, I reported how <a href="http://fantasyethos.com/2009/07/bleacher-report-censors-article-about-bleacher-report/">Bleacher Report had censored an article about Bleacher Report</a>. Last night I received an email from Dave Morrison at Bleacher Report, and he reported that the article had been re-posted. You can now find Don Fish&#8217;s article, &#8220;<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/218368-cbssportscom-burns-bleacher-report-applicants-for-nfl-correspondents">CBSSports.com Burns Bleacher Report Applicants For NFL Correspondents</a>&#8221; happily posted on Bleacher Report.</p>
<p>Kudos to Bleacher Report for reversing course, and posting the article online. While Bleacher Report has content deals with <a href="http://cbssports.com">CBSSports.com</a> and <a href="http://foxsports.com">FOX Sports</a>, the thousands of users generating content are its most important customers, and the ones that it needs to keep happy. If Bleacher Report were to get a reputation for censoring its users whenever it did not agree with them, that would be detrimental to the site&#8217;s long-term health and viability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fantasyethos.com/2009/07/bleacher-report-does-the-right-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

